May 31, 2008

links for 2008-05-31

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 30, 2008

links for 2008-05-30

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 29, 2008

links for 2008-05-29

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 28, 2008

Help me escape from Password Hell

Filed under: Web Survival, General Geekiness | Lindsay @ 11:24 pm

Password Plus and Super PasswordImage via WikipediaMy employer is performing the annual round of security training over the next couple of weeks and everyone received an email announcement today about it containing the following advice:

To help protect your personal financial information, you should have a different and unique password for all online services that you use. Remember, the best passwords use a combination of upper and lower case letters and numbers. An easy way to create and remember a unique password is think of a catchy phrase, and then use letters and numbers from the phrase to create your password.

While most would think that’s great advice, my immediate thought was “that’s insane! I have accounts on more than 100 services on the web! How can I possibly remember unique passwords for each one??”

I am a ravenous beta web application junkie, and I probably use at least 10 web services (email, rss, bookmarking, etc.) on a daily basis which all require passwords. And of course there are passwords that I use at work to access various systems, account passwords on the home computers and network, account credentials for my sidework clients (who depend on me to keep up with them!) and many more I’m sure I’m not thinking of right now.

I replied to the email and asked for suggestions of how to apply the advice in my situation. The response: try a password manager. But I’ve looked at those before and there’s a flaw - they can only store and retrieve your passwords on the computer you install them on. It’s not as if I only would only access passworded accounts from one computer. I have a computer at home (actually 4 to choose from at this point!), a computer at work, a Pocket PC phone, and a wi-fi enabled iPodTouch (when I borrow from the hubby), not to mention I do occasionally go places with computers I don’t own like my family’s houses. If I install a password manager on one computer then how am I suppose to use it on any of the others? Passing this on as a reply to the reply got no response.

My applied solution to the password overload problem has not been elegant. I hadn’t planned this method but it’s what I’ve fallen into. I basically have about 4 “levels” of passwords with about 10 total variations. That’s about as many as my brain can keep up with. Whenever I sign up for something I ask myself a few questions and pick a password:

Level 4

  • Attributes: Short, very simple
  • Variations: 1
  • Typical scenario: usually on a beta service signup
  • Questions answered “No”: Do I trust this service to keep my password? Will I ever use this service more than a couple of times?

Level 3

  • Attributes: Longer, still simple
  • Variations: 1
  • Typical scenario: on services I’m likely to use more than once or were highly recommended so I “trust” them.
  • Questions answered “No”: Will it be the end of the world if someone figures out my password and logs in as me?

Level 2

  • Attributes: Longer, with complicated numbers, symbols, capitalization
  • Variations: 3: chars with number, no symbols; chars with number and symbol; chars with number, symbol and capital
  • Typical scenario: a service that requires me to use passwords that meet their criteria
  • Questions answered “No”: Will this dang thing let me sign up already with level 4 or 3 passwords?

Level 1

  • Attributes: Relatively unique, using the whole “sentence as a password” thing to make something really strong.
  • Variations: about 5
  • Typical scenario: work credentials or a service that could expose my financial or other sensitive data
  • Question answered “Yes”: Would it be devastating for someone to get access to this info?

But there’s still all the services that insist that you change your password every cycle (especially at work). I’m guilty of putting a number at the end and incrementing those so I don’t have to remember something new.

There has to be a better way to deal with all this stuff. I’ve thought about keeping a list online somewhere but that seems inherently vulnerable. And, no, OpenID can’t fix this for me. So how do you manage account/password hell?

» » » » »
, , , ,

links for 2008-05-28

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 27, 2008

links for 2008-05-27

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 26, 2008

links for 2008-05-26

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm
Hello World 2.0

The new standard starter project for any web-based code library is creating a Flickr gallery widget. It’s Hello World 2.0.

May 25, 2008

links for 2008-05-25

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 24, 2008

The Fantastic Future of FriendFeed

Filed under: FutureSpec, Social Media | Lindsay @ 4:10 pm

I think I know what FriendFeed is really all about, and it’s simply brilliant.

FriendFeed as an Intelligent AgentFor those who have been following the conversations about noise on FriendFeed you know that many people (including me) have been asking for the ability to create filters to solve the problem. Some people have even suggested that the solution will be the Semantic Web or that FriendFeed is already a step in that direction. I think FriendFeed’s creators have even more ambitious plans.

FriendFeed is going to be an intelligent agent.

The setup is perfect. FriendFeed is gathering all of our attention data. It’s just a small leap to analyzing that data and finding patterns of usage for each FFeeder. Then it’s just another small step to apply those patterns to incoming data, both as filters on streams we subscribe to, and as alerts on streams that we don’t. It’s like reverse web site analytics: instead of analyzing what lots of people find interesting, it’s finding what’s interesting to a single person.

FriendFeed’s founders are from Google. They have experience with finding interesting things in large amounts of data. Search, from one angle, is simply gathering data from many sources, extracting what is relevant within a context and then prioritizing the results by ranking. It seems as if the same type of algorithms that are used to determine page rank with search engines could also be used to determine what’s interesting to us in the pool of our attention data.

At FriendFeed is each user is a context and ranking is a result of attention. With page rank, every link to a site is a vote for its contents. With attention rank, there is a chance to be even more precise because there can be negative votes as well. You’re voting on what’s interesting every time you participate and even when you don’t.

Votes Up:

  • Contributing content (big)
  • Creating or joining a room (big)
  • Subscribing to someone (big)
  • Creating an imaginary friend (big)
  • Commenting (big)
  • Liking (minor)

Votes Down:

  • Leaving a post in your stream untouched (minor)
  • Hiding (big)

The more you participate, the more you share about you and your interests, the better the agent will be able to work for you. All of these votes reveal keywords and context about what’s important to you and what’s not. And you’re constantly generating that information.

So what’s the big deal? It means a pleasurable, efficient, speedy, personalized experience consuming social media with little wasted time digesting noise. The uses could be to filter your stream (no more noise), find people who are similar to you (expand your network), find content you might not have noticed that you would like (information discovery), and even customized advertizing (that you’ll actually appreciate)!

FriendFeed’s founders have most likely learned yet another lesson from their old employer. Google has set itself up to be the gateway for the bulk of the world’s digital information. There’s a lot of power in that. FriendFeed is setting itself up to be the gateway for our attention. We’ll become extremely reliant on it to do the grunt-work of filtering and alerting us to what’s important to us. It will become a service we can’t live without.

And it will be a profitable service as well.

FriendFeed as an intelligent agent can also be a recommendation engine for products and services through tracking how often people with similar interests to you, or people you subscribe to (and generally trust), recommend them. But the most lucrative profits will come from extremely well-targeted advertising. If a FFeeder mentions he’s looking for a new camera, all the sudden he could be presented with offers from camera retailers for exactly the model he’s mentoned. As long as FFeeders participate and announce they are seeking something FriendFeed will deliver advice and ads of relevance. We won’t even mind we’re being advertised to because it will be useful and timely for us. Adding Amazon Wishlists is already a feed option. What if you received a coupon any time something in your wishlist went on sale? Would you be annoyed or appreciative? And what advertiser wouldn’t want to participate and have such a high probability of sales resulting?

It’s even possible that FriendFeed could share revenue with FFeeders based on their influence in resulting sales, giving a cut to the influencer in a model similar to Squidoo. Will they? Probably not, considering there’s possibilities there for abuse by spammers, but maybe. That could even help alleviate the issues many bloggers have with the conversation being diverted from their blogs to FriendFeed. Bloggers could still make money by producing good content that way.

Why do I think FriendFeed is going in this direction? There are already hints in what features they have and what features they don’t (besides the obvious aggregation features):

  • Stats for the top 10 people you find most interesting and who find you most interesting are already available. It’s logical to keep expanding on that.
  • Only offering Like and Hide on posts simplifies the voting system. Offering a starred ranking system would just confuse things.
  • They haven’t offered advanced threaded comments or a full blogging platform and probably won’t. Again, more simple to implement a voting system without these things, and they would be distractions from hooking 3rd party streams into the service. It sets up the impression that FriendFeed is the place to go to consume and attribute information instead of create it.
  • Rooms are an awesome way to get people to both cast a vote with their attention and also add context to any content. If content shows up in a room it’s most likely related to the room’s subject.

Maybe this is all just a pipe-dream of mine, but if this isn’t FriendFeed’s developers plan after all then it should be. The potential is there, not only for providing a service that so many people would benefit from, but simply to make a nice profit. I have great expectations.

» » » » » » » » » »
, , , , , , , , ,

Changes to Macro Linz subscriptions

Filed under: Macro Linz | Lindsay @ 12:00 am

Feed Icon by Dirceu Veiga
I am in the process of reviving this blog. For those of you who have been following for a while you know it’s languished over the last year or so. My job didn’t give me much time to author blog posts and most of my time spent on the web was just finding interesting content, so if something was posted it was generally my daily link post pulled from Del.icio.us. But I’ve changed employers and life is starting to get settled into a nice routine again so I am going to start posting again more regularly. I wanted to clean things up a bit here in the process.

It was suggested to me that it might be a good idea to remove my daily links post from my RSS feed. But since, for quite a while, there have been people subscribed to this blog when I hadn’t posted anything but links, I would have to guess that some of you out there do like them! For those folks, I hope you will subscribe to the new links only feed.

For the rest of you, the main feed now no longer includes the daily links and you don’t have to change anything: you’ll only receive blog posts from now on. If you like both, by all means please subscribe to both feeds! In whatever case, thank you for subscribing in the first place and I hope this change will make things better for everyone.

Here are the new feeds:

As I said, I am planning to post new stuff more regularly so stay tuned and thanks again for subscribing!

Rss newspaper by FastIcon.com - isn’t it cool?

» » » » » » »
, , , , , ,

May 23, 2008

links for 2008-05-23

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 22, 2008

It’s conversation for me. Why do you social network?

Filed under: Web Survival, Social Media | Lindsay @ 9:27 pm

Let's talk.I find people incredibly interesting. I love learning how they think and why they think the way they do. I like to debate, not to be argumentative (though it often comes off that way) but because I want to see if the other person can convince me that my viewpoint is flawed. When someone proves me wrong with a well-thought-out response I gain both new insight and new respect for them. Being exposed to new information and cataloging it is an addiction for me and I thrive on conversation.

That’s my reason for participating in social media: my whole goal is to be a part of the conversation. Apparently I’m in the minority.

It seems to me that there are two other goals that are much more common: building a reputation for yourself and/or to get the most attention and keep it. Both of those goals involve a lot of rules of conduct and seem to be a lot more work than fun.

Over the past few days I’ve noticed conversations pop up on FriendFeed about the “appropriate” ways to interact with the service. FFeeders have admitted that they alter their behavior now (such as not clicking on “like” and avoiding posting things to the external networks which feed into FriendFeed) simply as to not offend their followers. There are many debates on Blogging 1.0 vs 2.0 where blog authors are expected to follow the conversation wherever it is instead of expecting it to come to them which is causing loss of attention to bloggers’ sites. FFeeders are concerned about the noise that subscribing to many people generates and fretting over how to keep it all manageable.

Who has the responsibility of attention control? Those who post or those who subscribe?

I’ve been reprimanded for declaring that I “like” and share things on FriendFeed without much thought about whether it will distress my followers, but I think the burden of filtering content should be on the subscriber. I subscribe to many people myself so I understand that it’s a hassle to filter out the noise but I would rather people post what’s interesting to them and let me figure out what I want than limit their participation to give me less noise and possibly less insight.

It’s implied that there’s a contract between followers/followees that somehow makes the followee responsible for meeting the follower’s expectations. Who is serving their followers better? Me, by being myself, posting what’s interesting to me, and participating in the conversation or the people who spin cycles in internal debate over what/whether to share because sharing might cause them to lose some followers (and attention)? As a subscriber I already spend too much time discovering what’s important to me and sharing it. I don’t have time to filter out what’s not important to each of many followers.

If I didn’t share in a way that my followers appreciated when they chose to follow me, then they wouldn’t have subscribed. I would rather have a smaller number of followers who are closely aligned with my interests than a larger group that I have to censor myself to keep. Nothing is keeping them from unsubscribing if we no longer share the same interests. Is it realistic to say that if someone chooses to follow me I am under the obligation to provide them with input of consistent quality, quantity and timing?

If everyone is expected to put their followers first, participating in social media is more like a job than for enjoyment. I already have a job (or two) and don’t need any more.

For some people it is a job. For those people interaction is all about building your “Personal Brand” and having the most followers. I don’t begrudge those people laboring over how they participate because they’re making a living off of it. But how many A-Listers can there be? If you’re not going to lose your house because you quit making ad revenue off your blog then chill-out, sit down and share stuff with me. I don’t mind if you throw me a little noise. I just want to have a conversation and maybe make a few friends.

» » » » » » » » »
, , , , , , , ,

links for 2008-05-22

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 21, 2008

links for 2008-05-21

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 20, 2008

links for 2008-05-20

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 18, 2008

links for 2008-05-18

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 17, 2008

Differences in implementation

I attended a presentation on “Inbox Zero” by Merlin Mann and he made a great observation about all those email chain jokes and Snopes items you get from non-tech savvy people:

Forwarding emails is like blogging for old people.

Pegged it!

links for 2008-05-17

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

Why Twitter won’t be mainstream.

Filed under: Web Survival, Informatics, General Geekiness | Lindsay @ 12:14 am

I’ve been inspired recently to resuscitate my months-neglected Twitter account as an experiment because I’ve been seeing a lot of discussion on various blogs and FriendFeed touting all the benefits of being active with Twitter such as crowdsourcing, socialization and meeting new people with common interests. Most of these posters list their favorite Twitter services in a “quickstart” guide and seem to heavily imply that it’s easy to get set up and quickly reap the benefits.

But the Twitter evangelists seem to be either social networking A-listers who generate massive, nearly instant audiences in whatever service they sign up with or they are people who spend several hours a day cultivating their networks by actively monitoring and responding to tweets and putting a lot of original tweets out themselves or both.

The problem is that Twitter can be a pretty lonely and discouraging service if you don’t have any followers and the people you’re interested in don’t follow you back. You can’t have a conversation if no one is listening to respond. How do you even reach out to people that you’d like to have conversations with if they don’t follow you? You can’t direct message them and there’s not even a guarantee that they’ll see your @replies. To be successful at Twitter you have to spend a lot of time making a reputation for yourself and hope that the people you follow notice and return the follow. Chances seem slim unless you put incredible amounts of persistence and ego stroking into it to capture their attention.

And that’s why Twitter won’t ever be mainstream. Early adopters are techno masochists but other people aren’t. We’re often willing to put in an amazing amount of time and effort into new services and put up with a lot of frustration from them with even the smallest amount of perceived benefit. But everyone else is more sensible. They don’t have the time or motivation to build a successful Twitter network, and they never will with its current implementation. I see some of the same problems with the social aspect of FriendFeed, despite opinions to the contrary.

I’m going to keep trying for a while, with some good advice on the how instead of the why, and see if I can get my tweets out of the echo chamber, but I couldn’t honestly recommend Twitter to my coworkers or family members at this point because I know they wouldn’t be willing to spend the time and effort to make it benefit them. I see value in the idea of the service. I think eventually, once we get filters and intelligent agents to be our attention guardians we’ll be able to have good two-way conversations without the whole follower/followee model. At that point, Twitter will just have turned into a framework or protocol, but obviously it’s going to be a while before that happens.

Maybe I’m missing something and the Twitter-ken can tell me what I’m doing wrong. Please feel free to enlighten me!

» » » » » » »
, , , , , ,

May 16, 2008

links for 2008-05-16

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 15, 2008

links for 2008-05-15

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 14, 2008

links for 2008-05-14

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 13, 2008

links for 2008-05-13

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 12, 2008

links for 2008-05-12

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 11, 2008

links for 2008-05-11

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 9, 2008

links for 2008-05-09

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 8, 2008

links for 2008-05-08

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 6, 2008

links for 2008-05-06

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 5, 2008

links for 2008-05-05

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm

May 3, 2008

links for 2008-05-03

Filed under: Bookmarks | Lindsay @ 12:30 pm